PDF to PNG vs. JPG vs. WEBP: Which Format to Use
Published August 3, 2026
ItsaPDF can turn PDF pages into PNG, JPG, or WEBP images, but the best choice depends on what the page contains and what you're going to do with the image. Here's how the three actually differ.
The three image formats in plain terms
JPG (JPEG)
JPG uses lossy compression: it discards some image detail to shrink the file, with a quality setting that controls how much. It's the most universally supported image format and a reasonable default for photos and general sharing.
PNG
PNG is lossless — the pixels you get back are exactly the pixels that were rendered, with no compression artifacts. That fidelity comes at the cost of a larger file, especially for anything with a lot of detail.
WEBP
WEBP is a newer format supported by recent versions of Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari. ItsaPDF's PDF to WEBP tool uses WEBP's lossy mode with an adjustable quality setting, the same basic tradeoff as JPG — it's not a lossless mode in this tool.
Transparency: why it matters here, and why it doesn't for a rendered PDF page
PNG and WEBP both support transparency as a format; JPG doesn't. That said, a rendered PDF page is always opaque — a page has a real background (white, or whatever color the page itself uses), not a transparent one. So when you convert a PDF page to PNG, there's no transparency being "preserved": the output simply matches exactly what the page shows, saved without compression loss.
This is the opposite direction from converting an image into a PDF. When a transparent PNG is turned into a PDF page with ItsaPDF's PNG to PDF tool, that image's own transparency is preserved in the resulting PDF. Converting a PDF page back into an image doesn't involve that same transparency question, since the page itself was never transparent to begin with.
File size and quality tradeoffs
PNG produces the largest files of the three, in exchange for zero compression artifacts — worth it for pages that are mostly text, line art, or a screenshot, where sharp edges matter more than file size. JPG and WEBP both trade some detail for a smaller file, controlled by an adjustable quality setting from 60–100% in ItsaPDF's tools. WEBP's compression is generally more efficient than JPG's, so a WEBP image often looks similar to a JPG at a meaningfully smaller file size — useful when file size matters, such as publishing images on a website.
None of these figures are fixed — the actual size difference for any specific page depends on what's on it. A page of dense text compresses very differently than a page with a photograph.
Compatibility: where each format opens reliably
JPG and PNG open in essentially every image viewer, operating system, and application without exception — decades of universal support mean you rarely have to think about whether the recipient can open one. WEBP is well supported in current browsers and most modern operating systems and photo apps, but an older application, an outdated device, or software that hasn't been updated in a while may not display it correctly, or at all. If a WEBP image needs to open reliably for someone whose setup you don't control — a client, a government form, an unfamiliar piece of software — JPG is the safer default.
What the resolution setting (DPI) actually changes
All three PDF-to-image tools offer the same three resolution presets: 96 DPI ("Standard"), 150 DPI ("High"), and 300 DPI ("Print"). DPI stands for dots per inch — a higher number means more pixels are packed into each inch of the page, producing a sharper, larger image. 96 DPI is enough for viewing on a screen, 150 DPI is a reasonable middle ground for general sharing, and 300 DPI is the standard baseline for print or for zooming in heavily without the image looking soft. Resolution and format are independent choices — you can pair any DPI setting with any of the three formats, and a higher DPI increases file size regardless of which format you choose.
Going the other direction: turning images back into a PDF
Everything above covers converting a PDF page into an image. The reverse direction — combining JPG, PNG, or WEBP images back into a PDF — uses separate tools (JPG to PDF, PNG to PDF, WEBP to PDF, or the combined Images to PDF tool for a mix of formats) and has its own separate considerations, like page size and orientation, that don't apply when going from PDF to image. If you're scanning documents as photos and need the opposite conversion, that's the direction to look at instead.
Which format to choose for common situations
Sharing a page in a chat or email
JPG is a safe universal default — every recipient's device can open it without issue.
Printing or archiving text-heavy pages
PNG's lossless output keeps text and fine lines sharp, which matters more than file size for a document meant to be printed or kept long-term.
Publishing on a website
WEBP's smaller file size at a similar visual quality to JPG helps page-load speed, provided the site's audience uses modern browsers.
Screenshots, diagrams, and line art
PNG again, for the same reason as text-heavy pages — compression artifacts are most visible on flat colors and sharp edges, exactly what screenshots and diagrams are made of.
How to convert with each ItsaPDF tool
PDF to JPG, PDF to PNG, and PDF to WEBP all work the same way: open the tool and select your PDF, choose which pages to convert and a resolution (96, 150, or 300 DPI), set a quality level for JPG or WEBP, then convert and download the images individually or as a ZIP. PDF to PNG has no quality slider, since PNG's compression is lossless by design — only the resolution is adjustable.